et si on parlait vraiment d'injection, ici?
Publié : 24 janv. 2011, 13:32
voila, topic ouvert!
De la mécanique aux rencontres : le forum Mopar pour les vrais passionnés.
http://mopar-owners-club.com/forum/





My initial impression is that this system is a home run.
Configuring the computer and starting it up was pretty cool. Just a few simple steps like desired idle speed, cu
in, number of cyl, and calibrating the throttle position sensor at idle and WOT. She fired right up (after I
remembered to re-connect the coil wire -- Doh!), and settled into a real rough and slow idle.
Unbelieveably, the computer kept the engine running at a speed as low as 400 rpm (with the Holley, I couldn't
keep it from stalling much below 850). It got better and better as the engine warmed up, and the hole in the
thermostat to allow heat to get to the temp sensor seemed to work great. I did have to open the throttle blades
with the idle adjustment screw to get the Idle Air Motor into an acceptable range for controlling the idle (and
then re-calibrate the TPS).
Once warmed up to operating temperature, the car was immediately driveable, although a bit rough in spots. First
trip was about 15 miles including 55 mph highway and in town. The computer "learns" fast, and the driveability
improved rapidly. Now that it has "learned" what the engine wants at idle, the ECU has somehow taken quite a bit
of the "lump" out of the cam -- it still sounds great, just not quite as menacing as it did with the Holley.
I just got back from a cruise around the Atlanta area -- about 100 miles give or take. The AMX seems like a
different car -- the 3.91 gears used to make it seem like it was working hard at 70, but with the EFI, it just
cruises along -- just begging you to hammer the throttle. Except for some slight stumbling just off idle and at
constant engine speed around 2000 rpm in the lower gears, the throttle response is like nothing I've ever
experienced. My neck is thankful for high-back bucket seats.
il a eut des problèmes de relays qui prenait feu ou fondaient..Main goal was better fuel economy and easier tuning, as well as easier starting.
Par contre il n'est pas très clair sur le consommation...Epilogue:
Been a few weeks since the harness meltdown and replacement, but with some help and advice from PMM and others,
she's back together and all seems to be well.
FAST gave me no troubles about replacing the harness and checking out the ECU -- so no issues with their
warranty. Final assessment was a bad crimp on a relay socket terminal.
PMM turned me on to a source for some higher capacity (and probably better quality) replacement relays, so have
gone with them instead of the ones that came with the new harness. Weather finally cooperated just enough to
allow several longer trips, and no further issues with the relays and/or harness.
The FAST throttle body's "ported" vacuum source isn't very (ported). Sends almost the same signal as the
non-ported source below the butterflies. Maybe something to do with my cam needing a bit more throttle at idle,
but my old Holley 750's ported source was zero at idle -- the FAST piece sends about 10". This forced me to
re-think my timing setup, so I went back to a B28 vacuum can I got a while back from Phat348 (which I installed
with a cam to limit its travel to about 15 degrees vice 24 for stock can). I now have about 2.5 degrees initial
w/vacuum hose off, and ~17.5 with it connected at idle. Centrifugal advance is about 28 degrees all in at ~2800
rpm, for a total of just over 30 (and about 45 at highway cruise). May still play around with a bit more
initial, with corresponding reduction in vacuum travel, to bump up the total, but the car really runs good right
now, so may just leave it where it is.
All in all, this was a really fun project, and except for the freak bad connection, seems to be a quality system.
I would highly recommend it to anyone who is looking to avoid the headaches of dealing with carb tuning.
[/quotemsg]Best guess is about 10% better. Maybe a bit more. I've just learned that the carb I replaced was jacked
up, so maybe if it had been straight, the mileage increase would have been less.
Nonetheless, I'd do it again just for the driveability, even if it wasn't a bit better on
mileage.

http://www.stevesnovasite.com/forums/sh ... p?t=142949A friend of mine installed it in his 36 Dodge with a 440. When it had the carb on it he was always having trouble getting it to idle and run right. After installing the EFI it ran and drove like a dream. He could not say enough good things about it.
le mec dit qu'il tombe à 22 MPG sur l'autoroute ! par contre je ne sais pas ce que veut dire " with AFR at 14.7. ".I have the EZ EFI on my 69. I went with the complete fuel system and used a robbmc tank pickup. I used the steel line for a return line and kit fuel line for delivery. Everything went pretty much as described in the HRM story. I've had it on 1.5 trips (I'm in Orlando with it now) for a about 800 miles. Got about 22-23 MPG on the freeway with AFR at 14.7. It takes a little playing to work the transition from idle to cruise with the cam I have (284 comp) but way less than a carb switch. You can set the AFR while driving (son was with me on the first cruise to Ocala) and actually hear and feel the difference instantly when it changes. We put it on a trailer dyno at NPD and got about 7 more HP out of it than the same setup with a 750 Demon a few years ago. It starts right away with no pedal and idles fine after warmup. When the AC is on it keeps idle at the same RPM and adjusts for the compressor on/off. That means it idles at a stoplight without touching the pedal when the compressors cycles. I used an electric solenoid on the carb setup and it didn't work well. Tips are that you need a clean tach signal (they really mean that) so I switched from an 8 yr old Accell 300+ to an MSD 6AL-2 and my initial bugs disappeared. Also need to make sure your accelerator pedal linkage/cable is solid since it refernces throttle position. Mine was loose at the cable by about 1/4" and it made for an erratic idle transition until I figured it out. Problem disappeared when the cable stopped moving. The fuel pump is an inline Carter unit and the whine is kinda irratating. It gets a bit louder after a long run. Make sure you use the insulated clamps and extra padding if you have it. The system only reads fuel/air/throttle related stuff and there's no timing options. The handheld unit is pretty basic and kinda cheap but it works and is easy to figure out. I used an extension cable on the handheld and have it velcroed to my dash for driving and to my glove box door when I'm not playing with it. I plan to do the same install on my 67 with the 327 and use a 3/8 steel line vice the EFI setup. It's a little expensive but it's all there and the right setup for my use (8K a year).
par contre il ne parle pas de sa conso.So what was going to be a short drive to fill the tank turned into about a 50 mile cruise as the system just ran so nice. And just like installers and F.A.S.T. said the more I drove the better it got. I had a Biggs prepped 950 Holley HP on the car before and would not have thought that throttle response could be better. I was wrong. The EZ-EFI has GREAT throttle response with the idle set at 800 it sounds NICE! This btw was one of the reasons I decided to try EFI as getting the idle set so the car sounds good rumbling around at the cruise-in pretty much means stalled engine when you kick the AC on. That old A6 compressor is a PIG! The EZ-EFI has an input wire and a setting to up idle speed to compensate for AC drag!
14.7 c'est surtout la théorie.le dosage standard, régulé par la sonde lambda est en général 1/14,7 ou 1/15,3. c'est celui qui pollue le moins donc celui qui est utilisé au maximum (moteur chaud, pas de demande de puissance, bref en cruising quoi!).
:woohoo: Wouhou!!!!! Sers-moi la pogne, pour une fois je capte autant que toi en technique...c'est bon ça!!:pouet:P'tain, les mecs, je bite pas un traitre mot de ce que vous racontez...:blink: :(
(encore que "c'Tokyo met trique", je vois bien...):whistle:
Je panne pas grand chose non plus mais va bien falloir que je m'y mette, j'me suis remit a la H-D.....Fox écrit::woohoo: Wouhou!!!!! Sers-moi la pogne, pour une fois je capte autant que toi en technique...c'est bon ça!!:pouet:P'tain, les mecs, je bite pas un traitre mot de ce que vous racontez...:blink: :(
(encore que "c'Tokyo met trique", je vois bien...):whistle:
superbe !! pas un peu grande pour toi ? :)HemiWhyNot écrit:Je panne pas grand chose non plus mais va bien falloir que je m'y mette, j'me suis remit a la H-D.....Fox écrit::woohoo: Wouhou!!!!! Sers-moi la pogne, pour une fois je capte autant que toi en technique...c'est bon ça!!:pouet:P'tain, les mecs, je bite pas un traitre mot de ce que vous racontez...:blink: :(
(encore que "c'Tokyo met trique", je vois bien...):whistle:
Dyna wide glide 2011 vivid black, 1584 cm3 a injection ESPFI....on se refait pas:blblbl:
[img]http://mopar-owners-club.com/images/fbfiles/images0/VP1967555_1.jpg[/img]
Pffff...C'est malin...j'ai même pas compris le titre !! :P
Hey, ça a l'air de marcher, les couteaux...;)Je panne pas grand chose non plus mais va bien falloir que je m'y mette, j'me suis remit a la H-D.....
Dyna wide glide 2011 vivid black, 1584 cm3 a injection ESPFI....on se refait pas:blblbl: